Identification and segmentation of social and environmental criteria in multi-criteria analysis for selecting infrastructure investment options for road transport
PDF

Keywords

road transport
infrastructure investments
multi-criteria analysis
social impact
environmental impact

How to Cite

Bąk, M., Borkowski, P. ., Broniewicz, E., Budzyński, M. ., Dąbal, A., Grzelec, K. ., Jamroz, K. ., Kobryń, A., Ogrodnik, K., Ołdakowska, E., Siwowski, T., & Tłoczyński, D. (2025). Identification and segmentation of social and environmental criteria in multi-criteria analysis for selecting infrastructure investment options for road transport. Economics and Environment, 93(2), 1237. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2025.93.2.1237

Abstract

Studies show that road investments generate both positive and negative socio-economic and environmental impacts. Social effects include improved accessibility, safety, and reduced inequality, but may also lead to increased accident rates and health concerns. A key challenge in multi-criteria analysis is the accurate identification and classification of social and environmental factors. Methods such as literature reviews, surveys, interviews, and cost-benefit analyses are used to assess these impacts and support decision-making, for example, through social impact assessments. This paper explores the difficulties in categorising various criteria as social or environmental and the implications of these classifications for evaluation processes. The authors propose a revised set of social and environmental standards for multi-criteria assessment of road investment options and examine how reclassifying certain criteria affects their relevance and validity. The study contributes to improving evaluation frameworks for infrastructure planning and supports more informed, socially aware investment decisions.

PDF

References

Act from 3 October 2008. Act on providing information on the environment and its protection, public participation in environmental protection and environmental impact assessment. Journal of Laws No. 199, item 1227. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20081991227 (in Polish).

Adewumi, A. A. (2022). Reviewing the Challenges of Achieving Sustainable Road Infrastructure in Developing Nations. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 12(10), 9-15. https://ijmer.com/papers/Vol12_issue10/B12100915.pdf

Anciaes, P. R., Paul James, M., & Heywood, C. (2017). Social impacts of road traffic: perceptions and priorities of local residents. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35(2), 172-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1269464

Australian Government. (2021). Guide to economic appraisal: Technical guide of the Assessment Framework. https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-07/Assessment%20Framework%202021%20Guide%20to%20economic%20appraisal.pdf

Bąk, M., Borkowski, P., Grzelec, K., & Tłoczyński, D. (2024). KM1.3 Badania ankietowe z interesariuszami indywidualnymi i instytucjonalnymi. Raport projektu INROAD-WAP Wzorcowa metoda oceny inwestycji drogowej na etapie STEŚ uwzględniająca zasady zrównoważonego rozwoju w całym cyklu życia drogi. Wspólne Przedsięwzięcie pn. Rozwój Innowacji Drogowych – ID, RID-II/0019/2022 (in Polish).

Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2009.01.021

Behzadian, M., Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051-13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2012.05.056

Bhusal, B., Dahal, R. D., & Dahal, R. K. (2023). Problems in Road Construction at Local Level. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.3126/NJMR.V6I1.54360

Blanquart, C., Chen, C.-L., De Ureña, J. M., Delaplace, M., Gastineau, P., Koning, M., Liedtke, G., Pagliara, F., & Yoshino, N. (2020). Policy Brief the Wider Economic Impacts of Transportation. https://www.global-solutions-initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/T20_TF3_PB12.pdf

Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2017). Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice. Cambrifge: Cambridge University Press.

Broniewicz, E., & Ogrodnik, K. (2020). Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2020.102351

Broniewicz, E., & Ogrodnik, K. (2021). A Comparative Evaluation of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods for Sustainable Transport. Energies, 14(16), 5100. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN14165100

Broniewicz, E. & Ogrodnik, K. (2025). Application Potential of MCDM/MCDA Methods in Transport - Literature Review and Case Study. Sustainability, 17, 7671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177671

De Rus, G., Socorro, M. P., Valido, J., & Campos, J. (2022). Cost-benefit analysis of transport projects: theoretical framework and practical rules. Transport Policy, 123, 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.04.008

De Wit, A., & Over, E. (2024). Social Cost Benefit Analysis – a powerful tool for decision making. European Journal of Public Health, 34(Supplement_3). https://doi.org/10.1093/EURPUB/CKAE144.406

Department for Transport. (2018). Transport Analysis Guidance: The Transport Appraisal Process. https://www.gov.uk/transport-analysis-guidance-tag

Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, Pub. L. No. 32000L0060, 327 OJ L (2000). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32000L0060

Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise - Declaration by the Commission in the Conciliation Committee on the Directive relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, Pub. L. No. 32002L0049, 189 OJ L (2002). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2002/49/oj

Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, Pub. L. No. 32009L0147, 20 OJ L (2009). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009L0147

Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (codification), Pub. L. No. 32011L0092, 26 OJ L (2011). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32011L0092

GDDKiA. (2008). Podręcznik dobrych praktyk wykonywania opracowań środowiskowych dla dróg krajowych. Kraków: GDDKiA. (in Polish).

Ghassabian, A., Titus, A. R., Conderino, S., Azan, A., Weinberger, R., & Thorpe, L. E. (2024). Beyond traffic jam alleviation: evaluating the health and health equity impacts of New York City’s congestion pricing plan. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 78(5), 273-276. https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH-2023-221639

Gouett, M., Hu, T., Israelson-Kurland, R., Mukherjee, M., & Leach, N. (2020). Social Impacts and the Practice of Direct Infrastructure Investment. Full Report. https://www.guggenheiminvestments.com/GuggenheimInvestments/media/PDF/Tufts-Full-Report.pdf

Hosford, K., Firth, C., Brauer, M., & Winters, M. (2021). The effects of road pricing on transportation and health equity: A scoping review. Transport Reviews, 41(6), 766-787. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1898488

IAIA. (2024). Social Impact Assessment. https://iaia.org/social-impact-assessment/

IDCJ. (2003). Impact Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects In Northern Vietnam – Final Report. https://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/evaluation/oda_loan/post/2003/pdf/1-03_full.pdf

Kahangirwe, P., & Vanclay, F. (2024). Social impacts arising from road infrastructure projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: better management of social issues is needed in road construction, upgrading and rehabilitation. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 42(4), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2024.2385877

Kyriacou, A. P., Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2019). The efficiency of transport infrastructure investment and the role of government quality: An empirical analysis. Transport Policy, 74, 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.017

Lucas, K., Philips, I., & Verlinghieri, E. (2022). A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation, 49, 271-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10176-6

Manggat, I., Md Zain, R., & Jamaluddin, Z. (2018). The Impact of Infrastructure Development on Rural Communities: A Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8, 637-648. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i1/3837

Navarro-Moreno, J., Calvo-Poyo, F., & de Oña, J. (2023). Investment in roads and traffic safety: linked to economic development? A European comparison. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(3), 6275-6297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22567-y

Promethee Methods. (2024). Visual PROMETHEE. https://bertrand.mareschal.web.ulb.be/PG2024/visual-promethee.html

RID II. (2025). Wzorcowa metoda oceny inwestycji drogowej na etapie STEŚ uwzględniająca zasady zrównoważonego rozwoju w całym cyklu życia drogi. Wspólne Przedsięwzięcie pn. Rozwój Innowacji Drogowych – ID, RID-II/0019/2022. (in Polish).

Sipahi, S., & Timor, M. (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043920

Tini, N. H., Zaly, S. M., & Sultan, Z. (2018). Impact of road transportation network on socio-economic well-being : An overview of global perspective. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science Engineering and Technology, 4(9), 282-296. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4cb4a099-30b0-34b0-ba56-a1b0ec8e7995/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7B715e6828-1b15-4d6c-aca0-a3500eeff694%7D

Treviño-Lozano, L. (2022). Framing Social Sustainability in Infrastructure Theory and Practice: A Review of Two Road Projects in Mexico from a Business and Human Rights Lens. Sustainability, 14(4), 2369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042369

UNEP. (2020). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organisations 2020. https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Guidelines-for-Social-Life-Cycle-Assessment-of-Products-and-Organizations-2020-22.1.21sml.pdf

Vanclay, F. (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766491

Wijnen, W., & Stipdonk, H. (2016). Social costs of road crashes: An international analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 94, 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.005

Zamojska, A., & Próchniak, J. (2017). Measuring the Social Impact of Infrastructure Projects: The Case of Gdańsk International Fair Co. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 13(4), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.7341/20171342

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Economics and Environment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.