Cancer diseases in the public health system from the perspective of the well-being economy - the human capital theory approach
PDF

Keywords

well-being economy
cancer diseases
human capital
public health

How to Cite

Dokurno, Z. (2025). Cancer diseases in the public health system from the perspective of the well-being economy - the human capital theory approach. Economics and Environment, 92(1), 1082. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2025.92.1.1082

Abstract

Purpose: This paper explores the challenges of transitioning to well-being economy the problem of cancer diseases from the perspective of public health and human capital theory. The research question is how to achieve the standard of public health according to DET requirements, decreasing the level of cancer diseases. Methodology/Approach: The research utilises the concept of doughnut economics theory (DET) and neoclassical model consumer optimisation connected with New Public Health Theory (NPHT) and selected elements of human capital approach. Findings: Optimization of public health policy, taking into account cancer diseases, implies the optimum in accordance with Gossen's second law and requires determining the opportunity cost of expenditure on treatment and prevention in comparison with lost benefits in the form of wages and other indirect costs. Research Limitations/Implications: Due to the limited volume of the article, the American market was only analysed as the most developed one. Practical Implications: An optimisation model was created for the use in a developed public health system. Social Implications: The possibility of using the model in public health policy in the well-being economy. Originality/Value: An original calculation of the costs of cancer diseases was made based on the cost of lost wages and behavioural factors shaping their prevention and treatment costs were identified.

PDF

References

Becker, G. S. (2007). Health as human capital: synthesis and extensions. Oxford Economic Papers, 59(3), 379-410. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpm020

Brand-Correa, L. I., & Steinberger, J. K. (2017). A Framework for decoupling human need satisfaction from energy use. Ecological Economics, 141, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.019

Dokurno, Z. (2017). Modelowanie kapitału ludzkiego w gospodarce opartej na wiedzy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. (in Polish).

Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (Eds.). (1991). A Theory of Human Need. London: Macmillan Education UK.

Ehrlich, I. (2000). Uncertain lifetime, life protection, and the value of life saving. Journal of Health Economics, 19(3), 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00030-2

Fanning, A. L., & O'Neill, D. W. (2019). The Wellbeing-Consumption paradox: happiness, health, income, and carbon emissions in growing versus non-growing economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 810-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.223

Gough, I. (2015). Climate change and sustainable welfare: the centrality of human needs. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5), 1191-1214. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev039

Gough, I. (2017). Recomposing consumption: defining necessities for sustainable and equitable well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 375(2095), 20160379. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0379

Greene, J., & Cohen, J. (2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 359, 1775-1785. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1546

Jackson, T. (2008). Live better by consuming less?: is there a “double dividend” in sustainable consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198054084734

Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2017). Human well-being and climate change mitigation. WIREs Climate Change, 8(6), e485. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.485

Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Rao, N. D., & Oswald, Y. (2020). Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario. Global Environmental Change, 65, 102168. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378020307512

National Cancer Institute. (2021, October 24). Financial Burden Cancer Care. https://progressreport.cancer.gov/after/economic_burden

National Cancer Institute. (2023, October 24). Years of Life Lost. https://progressreport.cancer.gov/end/life_lost

O'Neill, J. (2008). Happiness and the Good Life. Environmental Values, 17, 125-144. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327108X303819

Quah, S. R. (2016). International encyclopedia of public health. Cambridge: Academic Press.

Raworth, K. (2018). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Tulchinsky, T. H., Varavikova, E. A., & Cohen, M. J. (2023). The New Public Health. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-04675-4

United States Government. (2024, October 24). Social Security, National Average Wage Index. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/AWI.html

WHO. (2007). The world health report 2007: A safer future : global public health security in the 21st century. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241563444

Wild, C. P., Weiderpass, E., & Stewart, B. W. (2020). World Cancer Report: Cancer research for cancer prevention. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39432694/

World Health Organization. (2007). World Health Report 2007. A Safer Future: Global Public Health Security in the 21st Century. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/43713/9789241563444_eng.pdf;sequence=1

World Health Organization. (2022, October 24). SDG Target 3.8 j Achieve universal health coverage. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/theme-details/GHO/universal-health-coverage

World Health Organization. (2023a, October 24). Cancer Today, Age-Standarized Rate (World) per 100 000, Tumour incidence, Both sexes, All cancers in 2022. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en/dataviz/maps-heatmap?mode=population&types=0

World Health Organization. (2023b, October 24). Age-Standarized Rate (World) per 100 000. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en/dataviz/maps-heatmap?mode=population&types=1

World Health Organization. (2023c, October 24). Absolute numbers, Incidence, Both sexes, in 2022. https://gco.iarc.who.int/today/en/dataviz/pie?mode=population&types=0&sexes=0&can cers=39&show_table_pie=1&group_populations=0

World Health Organization. (2023d, October 24). Absolute numbers, Mortality, Both sexes, in 2022. https://gco.iarc.who.int/today/en/dataviz/pie?mode=population&types=1&sexes=0&cancers=39&show_table_pie=1&group_populations=0

World Health Organization. (2024, October 24). WHO tumours classification. https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/welcome/#

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Economics and Environment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.