Critical processes and risk factors of disturbances in the implementation of ecological reusable packaging into context of e-commerce sustainable development
PDF

Keywords

e-commerce
ecological packaging
sustainable development

How to Cite

Motowidlak, U., & Tokarski, D. (2022). Critical processes and risk factors of disturbances in the implementation of ecological reusable packaging into context of e-commerce sustainable development. Ekonomia I Środowisko - Economics and Environment, 82(3), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.82.3.483

Abstract

 The aim of the article is to identify critical processes in the context of the implementation of returnable packaging in e-commerce and potential risk factors of disruptions in the use of ecological reusable packaging in e-commerce logistics services provided by Arvato Poland Sp. z o.o. they are based in Warsaw. The study is in line with the objectives of the European Green Deal and the circular economy. The applied research methods and techniques included: elementary analysis, desk research analysis, in-depth face-to-face interviews, causal analysis and selected methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis. The empirical study was carried out in 2021 in two locations of Arvato Poland Sp. z o.o. A review of the literature on the subject indicates that the use of ecological returnable pack-
aging in e-commerce logistics is one of the available solutions with great potential to strengthen the sustainable development of the fashion industry. However, the conducted research revealed a high complexity of problems, mainly in the process of accepting, packing, shipping and returning the packaging, which was considered critical for handling e-commerce orders. An in-depth analysis using the Ishikawa diagram identified the causes of potential risk factors for disruptions in the use of reusable eco-packaging in the e-commerce market. It was indicated that improving the process of its implementation should focus on removing factors that make up the identified main categories of their causes.
The conclusions of the study can have practical applications to improve the functioning of cost-effective and environmentally friendly e-commerce logistics. The system approach used by the authors in the study of returnable unit packaging in the sustainable development of closed-loop e-commerce contributes to the reduction of the research gap in this thematic area. The issue of ecological reusable packaging is in the initial phase of cognitive research and pilot tests.

https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.82.3.483
PDF

References

Accenture. (2021, September 20). The economic impact of buy now, pay later in the US. Accenture. https://afterpay-corporate.yourcreative.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Economic-Impact-of-BNPL-in-the-US-vF.pdf

Arvato Bertelsmann Supply Chain Solutions. (2022, July 10). https://arvato-supply-chain.pl/o-nas/kim-jestesmy

Arvato Bertelsmann Supply Chain Solutions. (2021, March 12). https://blog.arvato.pl/?s=e-commerce+opakowania

Bourlakis, M., Julien, D., & Ali, I. (2018). The next industrial revolution. How e-commerce is transforming B2B. DHL Express: Bonn. https://www.dhl.com/content/dam/dhl/local/global/core/documents/pdf/g0-core-whitepaper-dhl-b2be-commerce-en.pdf

Cooper, D. R., & Gutowski, T. G. (2017). The environmental impacts of reuse: A review. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12388

DHL White Paper. (2022). Delivering on Circularity. Pathways for fashion and consumer electronics. DHL Research and Innovation GmbH. https://www.dhl.com/content/dam/dhl/global/core/documents/pdf/DHL_Delivering_on_Circularity_White_Paper_2022.pdf

European Commission. (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640&from=EN

European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0098&from=EN

European Commission. (2022). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. On making sustainable products the norm. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022DC0140

Eurostat. (2022). Packaging waste statistics. Eurostat Statistics Explained. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Packaging_waste_statistics

Franklin Associates. (2018, December 12). Life cycle impacts for postconsumer recycled resins: PET, HDPE, and PP. Franklin Associates, A Division of Eastern Research Group (ERG). https://plasticsrecycling.org/images/library/2018-APR-LCI-report.pdf

Green Generation. (2021). Mobile Institute. https://mobileinstitute.eu/green#Green-Gener ion_WspolnieNaRzeczZiemi_2021.pdf

Guo, J., Yu, H., & Gen, M. (2020). Research on green closed-loop supply chain with the consideration of double subsidy in e-commerce environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149(1),106779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106779

Hischier, R. (2018). Car vs. Packaging: A first, simple (environmental) sustainability assessment of our changing shopping behaviour. Sustainability, 10(9), 3061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093061

IPF. (2021). Institute of Positive Fashion. The Circular Fashion Ecosystem: A Blueprint for the future. https://instituteofpositivefashion.com/uploads/files/1/CFE/Circular_Fashion_Ecosytem_Report.pdf

IRP. (2019). International Resource Panel. Global Resources Outlook: Natural Resources for the Future We Want. A Report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi, Kenya. https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/global-resources-outlook

ISPO. (2019). How Finnish Brand RePack Closes the Loop on Packaging. ISPO TEXT-TRENDS. https://www.ispo.com/en/trends/finish-brand-repack-closes-loop-packaging

ITU. (2020). International Telecommunication Union. Global E-waste Monitor 2020. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Environment/Pages/Spotlight/Global-Ewaste-Monitor-2020.aspx

Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Washington: World Bank Group Publications.

Korzeniowski, A., Skrzypek, M., & Szyszka, G. (2012). Opakowania w systemach logistycznych. Poznań: ILiM.

Kowalska, M., & Paździor, M. (2015). Zastosowanie diagramu Ishikawy jako narzędzia doskonalenia jakości produktów spożywczych. Postępy Techniki Przetwórstwa Spożywczego, 1, 136-139. https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-232fab77-f22c-4d70-969d-5c3bd43bedaf

Kulczycka, J. (2020). Gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym dla zmian klimatu. In J. Gajewski & W. Paprocki (Eds.), Polityka klimatyczna i jej realizacja w pierwszej połowie XXI wieku (pp. 55-69). Sopot: Centrum Myśli Strategicznych.

Kulczycka, J., & Pędziwiatr, E. (2019). Gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym – definicje i ich interpretacje. In J. Kulczycka (Ed.), Gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym w polityce i badaniach naukowych (pp. 9-20). Kraków: Instytut Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi i Energią PAN.

McKinsey. (2020). Fashion on climate: How the fashion industry can urgently act to reduce its greenhouse gas emission. McKinsey & Company and Global Fashion Agenda. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/retail/our%20insights/fashion%20on%20climate/fashion-on-climate-full-report.pdf

OECD. (2018). Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Economic Drivers and Environmental. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307452-en

Oláh, J., Kitukutha, N., Haddad, H., Pakurár, M., Máté, D., & Popp, J. (2019). Achieving sustainable e-commerce in environmental, social and economic dimensions by taking possible trade-offs. Sustainability, 11(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010089

PraxPack. (2021). PraxPack. Project. User-integrated development and testing of business models for reusable packaging solutions in online retailing. https://www.praxpack.de/en/

RePack. (2022, April 24). Why is reusable more sustainable than single-use packaging? http://originalrepack-2630758.hs-sites.com/why-is-repack-more-sustainable-than-single-use-cardboard-boxes

RePack. (2022, April 14). RePack Blog. https://www.repack.com/news/

Sala, S., Crenna, E., Secchi, M., & Sanyé-Mengual, E. (2020). Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries. Journal of Environmental Management, 269, 110686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110686

Sharma, N., Ghosh, S., & Saha, M., (2020). Open Data for Sustainable Community: Glocalized Sustainable Development Goals. Singapore: Springer.

Singh, C. S., Soni, G., & Badhotiya, G. K. (2019). Performance indicators for supply chain resilience: review and conceptual framework. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15, 110-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-019-00322-2

Sullivan, Y. W., & Kim, D. J. (2018). Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.008

Sun, M., Grondys, K., Hajiyev, N., & Zhukov, P. (2021). Improving the E-Commerce Business Model in a Sustainable Environment. Sustainability, 13(22), 12667. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212667

van Loon, P., Deketele, L., Dewaele, J., McKinnon, A., & Rutherford, C. (2015). A comparative analysis of carbon emissions from online retailing of fast-moving consumer goods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.060

Zimmermann, T., & Bliklen, R. (2020). Single-use vs. reusable packaging in e-commerce: comparing carbon footprints and identifying break-even points. GAiA Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 3, 176-183. https://oekopol.de/src/files/Carbon-Footprint-Comparison-of-Single-Use-vs.-Reusable-Packaging.pdf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Ekonomia i Środowisko - Economics and Environment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.