Environmental insurance and ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems – analysis of the willingness to implement systemic solutions relevant to insurance
PDF

Keywords

environmental insurance
environmental management system ISO 14001

How to Cite

Lemkowska, M., & Wiśniewska, D. (2022). Environmental insurance and ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems – analysis of the willingness to implement systemic solutions relevant to insurance. Ekonomia I Środowisko - Economics and Environment, 81(2), 106–132. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.81.2.452

Abstract

The first purpose of the research was to assess the dependence between the organisational decision-makers willingness to implement systemic solutions relevant to insurance (RSSs) and the attributes (systemic, awareness-related and organisational) of an organisation managed in accordance with ISO 14001. Another purpose was to identify the motivators that drive entities to implement additional system elements.
Earlier studies suggest that the structures of currently implemented ISO 14001 EMSs should be modified in order to increase their utility for the process of insurance provision.
The research problem was solved based on data obtained through an online survey among organisations implementing and certified ISO 14001 EMSs in Poland. Depending on the type of variables, the independence chi-square test, U-Mann-Whitney test, and the test of Spearman’s rank correlation, among others, were used for analysis.
The results of the study may help build integrated environmental risk management tools. They indicate the legitimacy of using non-insurance motivators (e.g. reduction of environmental fees) to achieve the desired EMS structure in the organisation from the insurers' point of view. At the same time, they emphasise the need to build environmental risk awareness (including, among other things, the risk of liability for environmental damage and its severity) to achieve the above.

https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.81.2.452
PDF

References

Act of 13 April 2007 on environmental damage prevention and remediation (consolidated text: Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland 2020, item 2187), Environmental Liability Act – ELA.

Barros, G. (2010). Herbert A. Simon and the Concept of Rationality: Boundaries and Procedures. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 30(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-31572010000300006

Beed, C., & Kane, O. (1991). What is the Critique of the Matematization of Economics? Kyklos, 44 (4), 581–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1991.tb01798.x

Bogdanowicz, B. (2014). Ekonomia behawioralna a klasyczny paradygmat ekonomii. Folia Pomeranae Universitatis Technologiae Stetinensis. Oeconomica, 313(76)3, 23–32.

Boiral, O., & Henri, J. F. (2012). Modelling the impact of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: A comparative approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 99, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.007

Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., McCaul, K. D., & Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Metanalysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behaviour: the example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.13

Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioural Economics: Past, Present, Future. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in Behavioral Economics (pp. 3–52). New York: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1515/9781400829118-004

Castka, P., & Prajogo, D. (2013). The effect on pressure from secondary stakeholders on the internalization of ISO 14001. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.034

Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400231

Cossette, P. (2014). Heuristics and cognitive biases in entrepreneurs: a review of the research. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 27(5), 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2015.1105732

Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, Pub. L. No. 32004L0035, 143/56 OJ L (2004).

Environmental Protection Agency. (2006). Financial Incentives from Environmental Management Systems (EMSs), Project Findings from Phase I. Washington: Environmental Protection Agency. https://nepis.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Law of 27 April 2001 (consolidated text: Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland 2019, item 1396), EPL.

European Commission. (2016). REFIT Evaluation of the Environmental Liability Directive (Commission Staff Working Document). Brussels: European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52016SC0121

European Commission. (2017). Multi-annual ELD Work Programme (MAWP) for the period 2017–2020: “making the Environmental Liability Directive more fit for purpose. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/mawp_2017_2020_1_en_0.pdf

European Commission. (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth (COM(2018) 97 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0097

Fama, E. F. (1998). Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns and Behavioral Finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(98)00026-9

Fura, B. (2013). Improving ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22(6), 1711–1721.

Gavronski, I., Paiva, E. L., Teixeira, R., & de Andrade, M. C. F. (2013). ISO 14001 certified plants in Brazil – taxonomy and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.025

Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2013). Environmental Management System According to ISO 14001 as a Source of Eco-Innovations in Enterprises – A Case of Podkarpackie Voivodeship. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 7(3), 650–655.

Hansson, S. O. (1994). Decision Theory. A Brief Introduction. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.

Hęćka, A. (2017). Świadomość ubezpieczeniowa przedsiębiorców polskich w zakresie ryzyka środowiskowego – wyniki badań. Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe, 4, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.33995/wu2017.4.3

International Organization for Standardization. (2015). Environmental management systems – Requirements with guidance for use (ISO Standard No. 14001:2015). https://www.iso.org/standard/60857.html

Janmaimool, P., & Watanabe, T. (2014). Evaluating determinants of environmental risk perception for risk management in contaminated sites. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(6), 6291–6313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110606291

Jovanovic, D., & Janjiz, V. (2018). Motives for, Benefits from and Accounting Support to the ISO 14001 Standard Implementation. Economic Horizons, 20(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonhor1801027j

Kaczała, M. (2019). Systemowe ryzyko suszy rolniczej a ubezpieczenia. Zadania dla państwa. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UEP.

Kotlarek, P. (2014). Racjonalność w ujęciu ekonomii behawioralnej. Studia Ekonomiczne – Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, 180, 106–116.

Lemkowska, M., & Wiśniewska, D. (2021). Elements of environmental management systems according to ISO 14001 relevant from the point of view of an insurance company – the results of empirical research. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(47), 271 – 306. https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2021.2.12

Lemkowska, M. (2020a). Systemy zarządzania środowiskowego zgodne z wymaganiami normy ISO 14001 na tle wybranych determinant rozwoju rynku ubezpieczeń środowiskowych. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.

Lemkowska, M. (2020b). The use of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in the process of preparation and provision of environmental insurance. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 1(346), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.346.04

Lemkowska, M. (2020c). ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems Assessment From the Insurers’ Point of View: Methodical Approach. In U. Akkucuk (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Creating Sustainable Value in the Global Economy (pp. 393-408). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Lemkowska, M. (2021). Perception of environmental insurance risk vs. implementation of control measures in organizations managed according to ISO 14001:2015 in Poland. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 83(4), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2021.83.4.13

Lisowska, A. (2014). Ochrona środowiska. In A. Florczak & A. Lisowska (Eds.) Organizacje międzynarodowe w działaniu (pp. 143–176). Wrocław: Agencja Reklamowa OTO.

Makuch, M. A. (2012). Decyzje podmiotów gospodarczych w ujęciu ekonomii behawioralnej. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, (27), 125–148.

Manimala, M. J. (1992). Entrepreneurial Heuristics: A Comparison Between High PI (Pioneering – Innovative) and Low PI Ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(6), 477-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90021-i

Matuszak-Flejszman, A. (2007). System zarządzania środowiskowego w organizacji. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej.

Matuszak-Flejszman, A. (2010). Determinanty doskonalenia system zarządzania środowiskowego zgodnego z wymaganiami normy ISO 14001. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego.

Minoli, D. M., & Bell, J. N. B. (2002a). Composite insurer consideration and attitudes on environmental management systems concerning public liability policies for pollution risks. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 4(3), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333202001042

Minoli, D. M., & Bell, J. N. B. (2002b). Insurer perception of environmental management systems regarding insurance for pollution. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 4(3), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333202001078

Minoli, D. M., & Bell, J. N. B. (2003). Reinsurers Opinions of Environmental Management Systems Concerning Insurance for Pollution. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 46(5), 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964056032000138490

Mruk, H. (2018). Ekonomia behawioralna a skuteczność zarządzania. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów. Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie, 167, 9-19.

Mullainathan, S. & Thaler, R.H. (2000). Behavioral Economics. Cambridge: NBER Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7948

Prajogo, D., Tang, A. K. Y., & Lai, K. (2012). Do firms get what they want from ISO 14001 adoption?: an Australian perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.019

Santos, G., Rebelo, M., Lopes, N., Alves, M. R., & Silva, R. (2016). Implementing and certifying ISO 14001 in Portugal: motives, difficulties and benefits after ISO 9001 certification. Total Quality Management, 27(11), 1211–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1065176

Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852

Simon, H. A. (1976). From Substantive to Procedural Rationality. In S. J. Latsis (Ed.) Methods and Appraisal in Economics (pp. 129-148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511572203.006

Śliwowski, P., & Wincewicz-Price, A. (2019). Prościej, taniej i skutecznie, czyli jak ekonomia behawioralna wspiera polityki publiczne w Polsce. Warszawa: Polski Instytut Ekonomiczny.

Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk In R. C. Schwing & W. A. Albers (Eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough? (pp. 181–214). New York: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9

Solek, A. (2010). Ekonomia behawioralna a ekonomia neoklasyczna. Zeszyty Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Ekonomicznego, 8, 21–34.

Sorooshian, S., Qi, L. C., & Fei, L. L. (2018). Characterization of ISO 14001 implementation. Environmental Quality Management, 27, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21532

Swiss Re. (1998). Environmental management systems and environmental impairment liability insurance. Two areas in strained relations or in harmony? Zurich: Swiss Re.

Thaler, R. (1994). The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Thaler, R. H., Sunstein, C. R., & Balz, J. P. (2013). Choice architecture. In E. Shafir (Ed.) The behavioral foundations of public policy (pp. 428–439). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Toma, L., & Mathijs, E. (2007). Environmental risk perception, environmental concern and propensity to participate in organic farming programmes. Journal of Environmental Management, 83, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.004

Tomer, J. F. (2007). What is Behavioral Economics? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.007

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Yin, H., & Schmeidler, P. J. (2009). Why do Standardized ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems Lead to Heterogeneous Environmental Outcomes? Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(7), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.629

Zaleśkiewicz, T. (2011). Psychologia Ekonomiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Zutshi, A. & Sohal, A. (2004). Environmental management system adoption by Australasian organisations: part 1: reasons, benefits and impediments. Technovation, 24, 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00053-6

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Ekonomia i Środowisko - Economics and Environment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.