Keywords
residential development
ecosystem services management
discrete choice experiment
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper addresses the realm of planning and managing greenery in multifamily residential areas. We uncover parallels between practitioners' approaches, residents' preferences, and the spatial attributes of residential areas that influence the supply of ecosystem services (ES). We focus on cultural ecosystem services (CES), the most directly experienced by urban inhabitants. Employing a multi-method approach encompassing a workshop for practitioners, a discrete choice experiment (DCE)-based survey of urban residents, and mapping of greenery attributes in Poznań (Poland). Our study underscores the importance of shaping conditions that facilitate bundled regulating and cultural ES. Practitioners recognise the role of greenery in the production of ES. This resonates with residents' preferences for predominantly green neighbourhoods, with the dominance of trees and some facilities for active recreation. Mismatches between opting for well-maintained greenery with some benches while neither the level of maintenance nor facilities for passive recreation are crucial for residents. Ultimately, we identify four types of multifamily residential areas reflecting varying degrees of resident preferences. These findings offer valuable information for the future development of multifamily residential areas, helping to design urban green spaces that respond to values and needs and, consequently, to increase the provision of cultural ecosystem services and support the regulating ones.
References
Allen, K., Castellano, C., & Pessagno, S. (2021). Using dialogue to contextualize culture, ecosystem services, and cultural ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 26(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12187-260207
Artmann, M., Inostroza, L., & Fan, P. (2019). Urban sprawl, compact urban development and green cities: How much do we know, how much do we agree? Ecological Indicators, 96, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.059
Ayala-Azcárraga, C., Diaz, D., & Zambrano, L. (2019). Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.005
Bastian, O., Grunewald, K., & Syrbe, R.-U. (2012). Space and time aspects of ecosystem services, using the example of the EU Water Framework Directive. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Ecosystem Services Management, 8(1–2), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.631941
Bateman, I., Carson, R., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., & Loomes, G. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bekő, M. (2015). Budapest’s large prefab housing estates: Urban values of yesterday, today and tomorrow. Hungarian Studies, 29(1-2), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1556/044.2015.29.1-2.2
Brandt, S., & Maennig, W. (2012). The impact of rail access on condominium prices in Hamburg. Transportation, 39, 997-1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9379-0
Calderón-Argelich, A., Benetti, S., Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J., Langemeyer, J., & Baró, F. (2021). Tracing and building up environmental justice considerations in the urban ecosystem services literature: A systematic review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104130
Cheng, L., Caset, F., De Vos, J., Derudder, B., & Witlox, F. (2019). Investigating walking accessibility to recreational amenities for elderly people in Nanjing, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76, 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.019
Chorążewicz, M. (2010). The role of landscape ecological aspect of spatial planning in Poznań. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, 28, 89-89. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/86809.pdf
Cohen, M., Baudoin, R., Palibrk, M., Persyn, N., & Rhein, C. (2012). Urban biodiversity and social inequalities in built-up cities: New evidences, next questions. The example of Paris, France. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(3), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.007
Cortinovis, C., & Geneletti, D. (2019). A framework to explore the effects of urban planning decisions on regulating ecosystem services in cities. Ecosystem Services, 38, 100946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100946
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87-114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
Czepczyński, M. (2008). Cultural landscapes of post-socialist cities: Representation of powers and needs. London: Routledge.
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Donkers, B., & Jonker, M. F. (2015). Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: A practical guide. Patient, 8, 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z
de la Fuente de Val, G. (2023). The effect of spontaneous wild vegetation on landscape preferences in urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 81, 127863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127863
de la Fuente de Val, G., & Mühlhauser, H. (2014). Visual quality: An examination of a South American Mediterranean landscape, Andean foothills east of Santiago (Chile). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(2), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.01.006
de Valck, J., Landuyt, D., Broekx, S., Liekens, I., de Nocker, L., & Vranken, L. (2017). Outdoor recreation in various landscapes: Which site characteristics really matter? Land Use Policy, 65, 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.009
Dieleman, F., & Wegener, M. (2004). Compact city and urban sprawl. Built Environment, 30(4), 308-323. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.30.4.308.57151
Erlwein, S., & Pauleit, S. (2021). Trade-offs between urban green space and densification: Balancing outdoor thermal comfort, mobility, and housing demand. Urban Planning, 6(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3481
Eurostat. (2021). Type of housing in cities or rural areas, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/digpub/housing/bloc-1a.html?lang=en
Farkas, J. Z., Hoyk, E., de Morais, M. B., & Csomós, G. (2023). A systematic review of urban green space research over the last 30 years: A bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 9(2), e13406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13406
Fish, R., Church, A., & Winter, M. (2016). Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services, 21, 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002
Frantzeskaki, N., & Kabisch, N. (2016). Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance—Lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. Environmental Science and Policy, 62, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010
Gadziński, J., & Radzimski, A. (2016). The first rapid tram line in Poland: How has it affected travel behaviours, housing choices and satisfaction, and apartment prices? Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.11.001
Gavand, K. A., Cain, K. L., Conway, T. L., Saelens, B. E., Frank, L. D., Kerr, J., Glanz, K., & Sallis, J. F. (2019). Associations between neighborhood recreation environments and adolescent physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 16(10), 880-885. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2018-0556
Gavrilidis, A. A., Zakerhaghighi, K., Popa, A. M., Akbarian, S. Z., Onose, D. A., Grădinaru, S. R., & Slave, R. A. (2023). Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provision by small public urban green spaces: Perspectives from different cultural backgrounds. Urban Ecosystems, 27, 699-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01480-3
Geoportal. (2019). Baza Danych Obiektów Topograficznych. https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/dane/baza-danych-obiektow-topograficznych-bdot (in Polish).
GEOPOZ. (2019). Tree height map. Board of Geodesy and the City Cadastre GEOPOZ. https://geopoz.poznan.pl/ (in Polish).
Grunewald, K., Bastia, O., Louda, J., Arcidiacono, A., Brzoska, P., Bue, M., Cetin, N. I., Dworczyk, C., Dubova, L., Fitch, A., Jones, L., la Rosa, D., Mascarenhas, A., Ronchi, S., Schlaepfer, M. A., Tezer, A., & Sikorska, D. (2021). Lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services concept in urban planning. Ecosystem Services, 49, 101273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101273
Grzyb, T., Kulczyk, S., Derek, M., & Woźniak, E. (2021). Using social media to assess recreation across urban green spaces in times of abrupt change. Ecosystem Services, 49, 101297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101297
GUS. (2022). Bank Danych Lokalnych. https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/ (in Polish).
Haaland, C., & van den Bosch, M. K. (2015). Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14, 760-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009
Haase, D., Dushkova, D., Haase, A., & Kronenberg, J. (2019). Green infrastructure in post-socialist cities: Evidence and experiences from Eastern Germany, Poland and Russia. In T. Tuvikene, W. Sgibnev & C.S. Neugebauer (Eds.), Post-Socialist Urban Infrastructures (pp. 105-124). London: Routledge.
Haase, D., Haase, A., Kabisch, S., & Bischoff, P. (2008). Guidelines for the “Perfect Inner City.” Discussing the Appropriateness of Monitoring Approaches for Reurbanization. European Planning Studies, 16(8), 1075-1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802315765
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1. Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf
Harrison, C., & Davies, G. (2002). Conserving biodiversity that matters: Practitioners' perspectives on brownfield development and urban nature conservation in London. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0539
Holmes, T. P., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2003). Attribute-based methods. In P.A. Champ, K.J. Boyle & T.C. Brown (Eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (pp. 171-219). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hong, A., Martinez, L., Patino, J. E., Duque, J. C., & Rahimi, K. (2021). Neighbourhood green space and health disparities in the global South: Evidence from Cali, Colombia. Health & Place, 72, 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102690
Jansson, M. (2014). Green space in compact cities: The benefits and values of Urban Ecosystem services in planning. Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, 26(2), 139-160. https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/12463/10/jansson_m_150806.pdf
Juutinen, A., Mitani, Y., Mäntymaa, E., Shoji, Y., Siikamäki, P., & Svento, R. (2011). Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: A choice experiment application. Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1231-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.006
Kaczorowska, A., Jaan-Henrik, K., Kronenberg, J., & Haase, D. (2016). Ecosystem services in urban land use planning: Integration challenges in complex urban settings—Case of Stockholm. Ecosystem Services, 22A, 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.006
Kim, H., Shoji, Y., Tsuge, T., Aikoh, T., & Kuriyama, K. (2020). Understanding services from ecosystem and facilities provided by urban green spaces: A use of partial profile choice experiment. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102086
Kronenberg, J. (2015). Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving Urban Ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 12, 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.002
Kronenberg, J., Skuza, M., & Łaszkiewicz, E. (2023). To what extent do developers capitalise on urban green assets? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 87, 128063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128063
Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder engagement: Past, present, and future. Business & Society, 61(5), 1136-1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211066595
Lakes, T., Brückner, M., & Krämer, A. (2014). Development of an environmental justice index to determine socio-economic disparities of noise pollution and green space in residential areas in Berlin. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(4), 538-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.755461
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225-248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
Louda, J., Vojáček, O., & Slavíková, L. (2021). Achieving robust and socially acceptable environmental policy recommendations: Lessons from combining the choice experiment method and institutional analysis focused on cultural ecosystem services. Forests, 12(4), 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040484
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lu, Y., Ferranti, E. J. S., Chapman, L., & Pfrang, C. (2023). Assessing urban greenery by harvesting street view data: A review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 83, 127917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127917
Luo, S., & Patuano, A. (2023). Multiple ecosystem services of informal green spaces: A literature review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 81, 127849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127849
Mania, W., & Kozacki, L. (2008). Wpływ nowych form osiedli mieszkaniowych na system przyrodniczy miasta (na przykładzie osiedli piątkowskich w Poznaniu). Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, 22, 243-258. (in Polish).
Manyani, A., Shackleton, C. M., & Cocks, M. L. (2021). Attitudes and preferences towards elements of formal and informal public green spaces in two South African towns. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104147
Mao, Q., Wang, L., Guo, Q., Li, Y., Liu, M., & Xu, G. (2020). Evaluating cultural ecosystem services of urban residential green spaces from the perspective of residents’ satisfaction with green space. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00226
Masik, G., Sagan, I., & Scott, J. W. (2021). Smart city strategies and new urban development policies in the Polish context. Cities, 108, 102970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102970
McMillan, A., & Lee, S. (2017). Smart growth characteristics and the spatial pattern of multifamily housing in U.S. metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 54(15), 3500-3523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016676008
Menconi, M. E., Palazzoni, L., & Grohmann, D. (2021). Core themes for an urban green systems thinker: A review of complexity management in provisioning cultural ecosystem services. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 65, 127355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127355
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
Misgav, A. (2000). Visual preference of the public for vegetation groups in Israel. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(3-4), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00038-4
Næss, P., Saglie, I. L., & Richardson, T. (2020). Urban sustainability: Is densification sufficient? European Planning Studies, 28(1), 146-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1604633
Nassauer, J. I. (1995). Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal, 14(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.14.2.161
Nazombe, K., & Nambazo, O. (2023). Monitoring and assessment of urban green space loss and fragmentation using remote sensing data in the four cities of Malawi from 1986 to 2021. Scientific African, 20, e01639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01639
Nedkov, S., Zhiyanski, M., Dimitrov, S., Borisova, B., Popov, A., Ihtimanski, I., Yaneva, R., Nicolov, P., & Bratanova-Doncheva, S. (2017). Mapping and assessment of urban ecosystem condition and services using integrated index of spatial structure. One Ecosystem, 2, e14499. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e14499
Neuvonen, M., Sievänen, T., Tönnes, S., & Koskela, T. (2007). Access to green areas and the frequency of visits – A case study in Helsinki. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 6(4), 235-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.003
Nordh, H., Wingren, C., Uteng, T. P., & Knapskog, M. (2023). Disrespectful or socially acceptable? – A Nordic case study of cemeteries as recreational landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 231, 104645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104645
Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A., Czepkiewicz, M., & Kronenberg, J. (2017). Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning, 160, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012
Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E., & Bieling, C. (2013). Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
Przewoźna, P., Mączka, K., Mielewczyk, M., Inglot, A., & Matczak, P. (2022). Ranking ecosystem services delivered by trees in urban and rural areas. Ambio, 51, 2043-2057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01722-2
Purcell, A. T., & Lamb, R. J. (1998). Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00073-5
Qiu, L., Yuxiang, D., & Liu, H. (2022). Integrating ecosystem services into planning practice: Situation, challenges and inspirations. Land, 11(4), 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11040545
Ranchod, Y. K., Diez Roux, A. V., Evenson, K. R., Sánchez, B. N., & Moore, K. (2014). Longitudinal associations between neighborhood recreational facilities and change in recreational physical activity in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis, 2000–2007. American Journal of Epidemiology, 179(3), 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt263
Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form. Oxford: Pergamon.
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. PNAS, 107(11), 5242-5247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107
Ronchi, S., Arcidiacono, A., & Pogliani, L. (2020). Integrating green infrastructure into spatial planning regulations to improve the performance of urban ecosystems: Insights from an Italian case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101907
Sagie, H., & Orenstein, D. E. (2022). Benefits of stakeholder integration in an ecosystem services assessment of Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve, Israel. Ecosystem Services, 53, 101404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101404
Saidi, N., & Spray, H. (2018). Ecosystem services bundles: Challenges and opportunities for implementation and further research. Environmental Research Letters, 13, 113001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae5e0
Schmeidler, K. (1998). Housing estate in the Czech Republic. European Spatial Research and Policy, 5, 71-74.
Schmid, H.-L., & Säumel, I. (2021). Outlook and insights: Perception of residential greenery in multistorey housing estates in Berlin, Germany. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 63, 127231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127231
Scholte, S. S., van Teeffelen, A. J., & Verburg, P. H. (2015). Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods. Ecological Economics, 114, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007
Sefcik, J. S., Kondo, M. C., Klusaritz, H., Sarantschin, E., Solomon, S., Roepke, A., South, E. C., & Jacoby, S. F. (2019). Perceptions of nature and access to green space in four urban neighborhoods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132313
Sikorski, P., Gawryszewska, B., Sikorska, D., Chormański, J., Schwerk, A., Jojczyk, A., Ciężkowski, W., Archiciński, P., Łepkowski, M., Dymitryszyn, I., Przybysz, A., Wińska-Krysiak, M., Zajdel, B., Matusiak, J., & Łaszkiewicz, E. (2021). The value of doing nothing – How informal green spaces can provide comparable ecosystem services to cultivated urban parks. Ecosystem Services, 50, 101339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101339
Staats, H., Gatersleben, B., & Hartig, T. (1997). Change in mood as a function of environmental design: Arousal and pleasure on a simulated forest hike. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(4), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0069
Stewart, I. S., & Lewis, D. (2017). Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’. Earth-Science Reviews, 174, 122-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.003
Szulczewska, B., Giedych, R., Borowski, J., Kuchcik, M., Sikorski, P., Mazurkiewicz, A., & Stańczyk, T. (2014). How much green is needed for a vital neighbourhood? In search for empirical evidence. Land Use Policy, 38, 330-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.006
Tandarić, N., Ives, C. D., & Watkins, C. (2020). Can we plan for urban cultural ecosystem services? Journal of Urban Ecology, 6(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juaa016
Tandarić, N., Ives, C. D., & Watkins, C. (2022). From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 120, 106309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106309
Tusznio, J., Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A., Rechciński, M., Olszańska, A., & Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. (2020). Application of the ecosystem services concept at the local level – Challenges, opportunities, and limitations. Ecosystem Services, 42, 101077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101077
Uittenbroek, C. J., Mees, H., Hegger, D. L., & Driessen, P. P. (2019). The design of public participation: Who participates, when and how? Insights in climate adaptation planning from the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(14), 2529-2547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1569503
Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In S.R. Kellert & E.O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73-137). Washington: Island Press.
Van Haaren, C., & Albert, C. (2011). Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: Limitations and synergies. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7(3), 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.616534
Wang, Y., Potoglou, D., Orford, S., & Gong, Y. (2015). Bus stop, property price and land value tax: A multilevel hedonic analysis with quantile calibration. Land Use Policy, 42, 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.017
Winston, N. (2017). Multifamily housing and resident life satisfaction in Europe: An exploratory analysis. Housing Studies, 32(7), 887-911. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1280776
Zhao, H., Zhu, T., Wang, S., & Lindley, S. (2022). Study on the changes of urban green space with remote sensing data: A comparison of Nanjing and Greater Manchester. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(1), 461-474. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/138208
Zulian, G., Marando, F., Mentaschi, L., Alzetta, C., Wilk, B., & Maes, J. (2022). Green balance in urban areas as an indicator for policy support: A multi-level application. One Ecosystem, 7, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.7.e72685
Zwierzchowska, I., Haase, D., & Dushkova, D. (2021). Discovering the environmental potential of multi-family residential areas for nature-based solutions: A Central European cities perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 206, 103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103975
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Economics and Environment