The impact of the agreement by the Regional Director of Environmental Protection on the decision on environmental dependencies for the implementation of an investment in Poland
PDF

Keywords

decision
environment
agreement
sustainability reporting regulation, environmental policy evaluation

How to Cite

Bołtryk, P. (2023). The impact of the agreement by the Regional Director of Environmental Protection on the decision on environmental dependencies for the implementation of an investment in Poland . Ekonomia I Środowisko - Economics and Environment, 83(4), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.83.4.549

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to attempt answering a question about the impact that the agreement reached by the Regional Director for Environmental Protection has on decisions regarding environmental dependencies in Poland. So far, two positions have been expressed in the literature on the subject. According to the first one, such an agreement is binding for the authority issuing the decision. The opponents of such an approach, on the other hand, argue that the administrative body is independent in that respect. The author, although attempting an in-depth analysis of both approaches, is in favour of the first one, additionally taking into account arguments of a juridical, functional and teleological nature. The case study concerned the construction of five buildings for breeding chicken broilers or turkeys along with the accompanying infrastructure on a property located within Solniki, municipality of Zabłudów.

https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.83.4.549
PDF

References

Act from 16 April 2004 on nature protection. Journal of Laws of 2022, item 916.

Act from 14 June 1960. The Code of Administrative Procedure. Journal of Laws No. 30, item 168, as amended.

Act from 23 October 2008 on the provision of information pertaining to the environment and its protection, public participation in environmental protection and environmental impact assessments. Journal of Laws No. 199, item 1227.

Bołtryk, P. (2017). The procedure of obtaining a decision on the environmental conditions of consent for the implementation of an undertaking on the example of an investing consisting in the construction of a broiler house in a mulching system together with accompanying infrastructure, Economics and Environment, 3(62), 82-91.

Cempura, A., & Kasolik, A. (2022). Wymagane prawem stanowisko innego organu. In A. Cempura & A. Kasolik (Eds.), Metodyka sporządzania pism procesowych w sprawach karnych, cywilnych, gospodarczych i administracyjnych. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.

Council of Ministers from September 10, 2019 on projects that may have a significant impact on the environment. Journal of Laws, item 1839, as amended.

Człowiekowska, J. (2005). O współdziałaniu organów administracji publicznej na przykładzie postępowania w sprawie ustalenia warunków zabudowy i zagospodarowania terenu. Casus, 3, 24.

Judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Łódź from April 14, 2021, reference number II SA/Łd 51/21.

Judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Poznań from February 7, 2018, reference number IV SA/Po 292/15.

Judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Poznań of November 17, 2016, reference number IV Sa/Po 519/16.

Judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Szczecin from November 22, 2017, reference number II SA/Sz 998/17.

Judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Warsaw from January 31, 2018, reference number III SA/Wa 627/17.

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court from March 22, 2017, reference number II GSK 1519/15.

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court in Warsaw from February 21, 2012, reference number II OSK 2544/11.

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court in Warsaw from July 01, 2016, reference number II OSK 339/15.

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court in Warsaw from June 6, 2013, reference number II OSK 3064/12.

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court in Warsaw from June 10, 2020, reference number II OSK 3873/19.

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court in Warsaw from November 10, 2016, reference number II OSK 1784/15.

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court in Warsaw of March 16, 2021, reference number III OSK 3925/21.

Kozińska, A. M. (2008). Zadania i kompetencje organów ochrony środowiska i organów ochrony przyrody. Prawo i Środowisko, 4, 86-101.

Przybysz, P. M. (2022). Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego. Komentarz aktualizowany. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.

Resolution No. XXIX/179/05 of the Zabłudów City Council from November 26, 2005.

Romańska, M. (2019). In H. Knysiak-Sudyka (Ed.) Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego. Komentarz, wyd. II. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.

Słownik Języka Polskiego. (2022, November 11). https://sjp.pwn.pl/sjp/uzgodnic;2534116.html

Staniszewska, L. (2021). Instytucja współdziałania materialnego w wydawaniu aktów administracyjnych na przykładzie wybranych porządków prawnych – Polski i Republiki Federalnej Niemiec. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 83(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2021.83.1.10

Świątkiewicz, J. (1964). Z problematyki współdecyzji organów administracyjnych. Prokuratura i Prawo, 5-6, 771-782.

Wiktionary. (2022, November 11). https://pl.wiktionary.org/wiki/bra%C4%87_pod_uwag %C4%99

Zimmermann, J. (1983). Nowe rodzaje postanowień w k.p.a..Prokuratura i Prawo, 1, 63.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Ekonomia i Środowisko - Economics and Environment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.