Share of mechanical-biological installation of waste processing (mbp) in the level of recycling and preparation for re-use of paper, metals, plastics, and glass achieved by municipalities
PDF

Keywords

recycling rate
waste
waste treatment facility

How to Cite

Krysztopik, A., Tałałaj, I. A., & Biedka, P. (2023). Share of mechanical-biological installation of waste processing (mbp) in the level of recycling and preparation for re-use of paper, metals, plastics, and glass achieved by municipalities. Economics and Environment, 84(1), 210-228. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2023.84.1.511

Abstract

The article aims to determine the share of mechanical-biological installation of waste processing (MBP) in the levels of recycling and preparation for the reuse of paper, metals, plastics, and glass (PMPG) achieved by municipalities. Two MBP installations were taken for the analysis - with the highest and the lowest share of municipalities in the Podlaskie Voivodship (Poland), which reached the recycling level required in 2019. In order to determine the share of MBP installations in the level of recycling achieved by communes, the share of the mass of recycled PMPG waste segregated from mixed municipal waste was calculated: in the total mass of generated PMPG waste and in the total mass of recycled PMPG waste from the municipal waste stream. On the basis of the conducted analyses, it should be stated that the MBP installation may have an impact on the achievement by municipalities of the recycling level required by law.

PDF

References

Abbott, A., Nandeibam, S., & O'Shea, L. (2011). Explaining the variation in household recycling rates across the UK. Ecological Economics, 70 (11), 2214-2223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.028

Act of September 13, 1996, on maintaining cleanliness and order in municipalities, Journal of Laws of 2022, item 1297. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19961320622/U/D19960622Lj.pdf

Antonopoulos, I., Faraca, G., & Tonini, D. (2021). Recycling of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in the EU: Recovery rates, material flows, and barriers. Waste Management, 126, 694-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.002

Brouwer, M. T., Thoden van Velzen, E. U., Augustinus, A., Soethoudt, H., De Meester, S., & Ragaert, K. (2018). Predictive model for the Dutch post-consumer plastic packaging recycling system and implications for the circular economy. Waste Management, 71, 62-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.034

Cerqueira, P. A., & Soukiazis, E. (2022). Socio-economic and political factors affecting the rate of recycling in Portuguese municipalities. Economic Modelling, 108, 105779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105779

Cimpan, C., Maul, A., Jansen, M., Pretz, T., & Wenzel, H. (2015). Central sorting and recovery of MSW recyclable materials: a review of technological state-of-the-art, cases, practice and implications for materials recycling. Journal of Environmental Management, 156, 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.025

Das, S. K., & Hughes, M. (2006). Improving aluminium can recycling rates: A six sigma study in Kentucky. JOM, 58, 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0049-1

Dijkgraaf, E., & Gradus, R. (2017). An EU Recycling Target: What Does the Dutch Evidence Tell Us? Environmental and Resource Economics, 68, 501-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0027-1

Eriksen, M. K., & Astrup, T. F. (2019). Characterisation of source-separated, rigid plastic waste and evaluation of recycling initiatives: Effects of product design and source-separation system. Waste Management, 87, 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1016j.wasman.2019.02.006

Fizaine, F. (2020). The economics of recycling rate: New insights from waste electrical and electronic equipment. Resources Policy, 67, 101675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101675

Huysman, S., Debaveye, S., Schaubroeck, T., De Meester, S., Ardente, F., Mathieux, F., & Dewulf, J. (2015). The recyclability benefit rate of closed-loop and open-loop systems: A case study on plastic recycling in Flanders. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.014

Luijsterburg, B., & Goossens, H. (2014). Assessment of plastic packaging waste: Material origin, methods, properties. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 85, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.010

Mastellone, M. L., Cremiato, R., Zaccariello, L., & Lotito, R. (2017). Evaluation of performance indicators applied to a material recovery facility fed by mixed packaging waste. Waste Management, 64, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.02.030

Montejo, C., Tonini, D., del Carmen Márquez, M., & Astrup, T. F. (2013). Mechanical–biological treatment: Performance and potentials. An LCA of 8 MBT plants, including waste characterisation. Journal of Environmental management, 128, 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.063

Muñoz, I., Rieradevall, J., Doménech, X., & Milà, L. (2004). LCA application to integrated waste management planning in Gipuzkoa (Spain). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9, 272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978603

Navarotto, P., & Dominguez Llauro, R. (2012). Materials recovery from municipal solid waste: ECOPARC 4 Barcelona a case study. Atti del Convegno Sidisa.

Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of December 14, 2016, on the recycling levels, preparation for re-use, and recovery by other methods of specific fractions of municipal waste, Journal of Laws of 2016, 2167. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20160002167/O/D20162167.pdf

Schenk, N.J., Moll, H.C. & Potting, J. (2004). The Nonlinear Relationship between Paper Recycling and Primary Pulp Requirements. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8, 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198042442379

Schmalbein, N., & Pretz, T. (2011). Economic aspects of the resource recovery from mixed municipal solid waste. Sardinia 2011, Thirteenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, CISA Publisher, Italy.

SWANA. (2013). Solid Waste Association of North America. Source-separation and Mixed Waste Recycling Systems: a Comparative Analysis. Silver Spring, MD.

Tatoutchoup, F. D. (2016). Optimal rate of paper recycling. Forest Policy and Economics, 73, 264-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.09.022

Thoden van Velzen, E. U., Jansen, M., Brouwer, M. T., Feil, A., Molenveld, K., & Pretz, Th. (2017). Efficiency of recycling post-consumer plastic packages. AIP Conference Proceedings 1914, 170002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016785

Van Velzen, E. T., Brouwer, M. T., Keijsers, E. R. P., Pretz, T., Feil, A., & Jansen, M. (2014). Pilot beverage cartons: extended technical report, 1440. Wageningen UR-Food & Biobased Research.

Wellacher, M. (2011). MBT Larnaka, Cyprus-Waste Treatment Technology from Komptech. In Waste to Resources 2011, 1-6.

Wiśniewska, M., & Lelicińska-Serafin, K. (2018). The effectiveness of the mechanical treatment of municipal waste using the example of a selected installation. VI International Conference of Science and Technology INFRAEKO 2018 Modern Cities. Infrastructure and Environment, 45, 00102. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184500102

WRAP. (2022, August 14). Recovering value from MRFs. A review of key studies relating to the specification, operation and costs of Material Recovery Facilities. Waste & Resources Action Programme 2014. https://slidelegend.com/recovering-value-from-mrfs-wrap_5c1fbd06097c4741188b4576.html

Zhang, X., Liu, C., Chen, Y., Zheng, G., & Chen, Y. (2022). Source separation, transportation, pretreatment, and valorization of municipal solid waste: a critical review. Environment, Development and Sustainability 24, 11471-11513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01932-w

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Economics and Environment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.