Keywords
door-to-door survey, ecosystem potential, mapping ecosystem capacities, relative ranks
How to Cite
Kowalska, A. ., Affek, A. ., Solon, J., Degórski, M., Grabińska, B., Kołaczkowska, E. ., Kruczkowska, B. ., Regulska, E. ., Roo-Zielińska, E. ., Wolski, J. ., & Zawiska, I. . (2017). POTENTIAL OF CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN POSTGLACIAL LANDSCAPE FROM THE BENEFICIARIES’ PERSPECTIVE. Economics and Environment, 60(1), 10. https://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/journal/article/view/252
Abstract
The paper presents the results of a questionnaire carried out among landscape users in Suwałki and Augustów Region concerning the perception of goods of nature. Respondents were asked to assign services to 7 ecosystem types (deciduous forest, coniferous forest, swamp forest, grasslands, croplands, wetlands, water bodies) and rank them in order of importance. Our intention was to
show the potential/capacity of each ecosystem type to deliver four cultural ecosystem services: sport and recreation, inspiration for creative work, education and science and spiritual experience in the view of local community and tourists.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.