Institutional quality and government expenditure: an empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in G20 countries
PDF

Keywords

carbon emissions
institutional quality
government expenditure
environmental Kuznets curve

How to Cite

Suyanto, S., Almughni, M. A. A., Suprijati, J., Standsyah, R. E., & Dwiningwarni, S. S. (2024). Institutional quality and government expenditure: an empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in G20 countries. Economics and Environment, 90(3), 883. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2024.90.3.883

Abstract

G20 member countries are forced to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the global community as well as economic development constraints from domestic resources and the environment. Literature related to institutional quality and government expenditure is still limited, especially in G20 countries. To provide empirical evidence to support the theoretical argument, the study investigated the effects of institutional quality and government expenditure on CO2 emissions using a balanced panel dataset of nineteen countries that were members of the G20 between 1995 and 2015. Empirical results show that institutional quality is able to reduce carbon emissions. A good government can formulate strict environmental regulations and ensure transparency, which allows investment in green technologies and renewable energy. Other findings suggest that government spending can increase carbon emissions. The findings show that government spending in G20 countries still does not consider environmental impacts. Several policy recommendations are suggested.

PDF

References

Adewuyi, A. O. (2016). Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.090

Amin, A., Ameer, W., Yousaf, H., & Akbar, M. (2022). Financial Development, Institutional Quality, and the Influence of Various Environmental Factors on Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Exploring the Nexus in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.838714

Apergis, N., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, 52, 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026

Aytun, C., Erdogan, S., Pata, U. K., & Cengiz, O. (2024). Associating environmental quality, human capital, financial development and technological innovation in 19 middle-income countries: A disaggregated ecological footprint approach. Technology in Society, 76, 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102445

Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Cham: Springer.

Beckerman, W. (1992). Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? whose environment? World Development, 20(4), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90038-W

Bekhet, H. A., & Othman, N. S. (2018). The role of renewable energy to validate dynamic interaction between CO2 emissions and GDP toward sustainable development in Malaysia. Energy Economics, 72, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.028

Ben Jebli, M., & Ben Youssef, S. (2015). The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.049

Bletsas, K., Oikonomou, G., Panagiotidis, M., & Spyromitros, E. (2022). Carbon Dioxide and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Role of Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy, and Institutional Quality. Energies, 15(13), 4733. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134733

Chang, H. Y., Wang, W., & Yu, J. (2021). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A spatial dynamic panel data approach. Energy Economics, 104, 105600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105600

Chen, J., Xian, Q., Zhou, J., & Li, D. (2020). Impact of income inequality on CO2 emissions in G20 countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 110987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110987

Dogan, E., & Seker, F. (2016). The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 1074-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006

Dong, B., Wang, F., & Guo, Y. (2016). The global EKCs. International Review of Economics and Finance, 43, 210-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.02.010

Dong, K., Dong, X., & Jiang, Q. (2020a). How renewable energy consumption lower global CO2 emissions? Evidence from countries with different income levels. World Economy, 43(6), 1665-1698. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12898

Dong, K., Hochman, G., & Timilsina, G. R. (2020b). Do drivers of CO2 emission growth alter overtime and by the stage of economic development? Energy Policy, 140, 111420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111420

Erdogan, S., Pata, U. K., & Solarin, S. A. (2023). Towards carbon-neutral world: The effect of renewable energy investments and technologies in G7 countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 186, 113683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113683

Eweade, B. S., Karlilar, S., Pata, U. K., Adeshola, I., & Olaifa, J. O. (2023). Examining the asymmetric effects of fossil fuel consumption, foreign direct investment, and globalization on ecological footprint in Mexico. Sustainable Development, 32(4), 2899-2909. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2825

Fernández, Y. F., López, M. A. F., & Blanco, B. O. (2018). Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3459-3467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.001

Galeotti, M. (2007). Economic growth and the quality of the environment: Taking stock. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 9(4), 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9030-y

Gao, W., Liang, S., Wang, R., Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Q., Xie, B., Toe, C. Y., Zhu, X., Wang, J., Huang, L., Gao, Y., Wang, Z., Jo, C., Wang, Q., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Louis, B., Scott, J., Roger, A.-C., Amal, R., He, H., & Park, S.-E. (2020). Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization: state of the art and future challenges. Chemical Society Reviews, 49(23), 8584-8686. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00025F

Gill, A. R., Viswanathan, K. K., & Hassan, S. (2017). Is environmental kuznets curve still relevant? International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(1), 156-165. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/3644

Gyamfi, B. A., Adedoyin, F. F., Bein, M. A., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Environmental implications of N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve for E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(25), 33072-33082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12967-x

International Monetary Fund. (2024). Government expenditure, percent of GDP. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/exp@FPP/USA/FRA/JPN/GBR/SWE/ESP/ITA/ZAF/IND

Iwata, H., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2011). A note on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2: A pooled mean group approach. Applied Energy, 88(5), 1986-1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.005

Jiang, X., Nie, X., Guo, X., Song, C., & Chen, J. G. (2020). Recent Advances in Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation to Methanol via Heterogeneous Catalysis. Chemical Reviews, 120(15), 7984-8034. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00723

Kamal, M., Usman, M., Jahanger, A., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2021). Revisiting the role of fiscal policy, financial development, and foreign direct investment in reducing environmental pollution during globalization mode: Evidence from linear and nonlinear panel data approaches. Energies, 14(21), 6968. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14216968

Khan, I., Hou, F., Zakari, A., Irfan, M., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Links among energy intensity, non-linear financial development, and environmental sustainability: New evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129747

Khan, Z., Ali, S., Dong, K., & Li, R. Y. M. (2021). How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? The roles of institutions and human capital. Energy Economics, 94, 105060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105060

Leal, P. H., & Marques, A. C. (2022). The evolution of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis assessment: A literature review under a critical analysis perspective. Heliyon, 8(11), e11521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11521

López-Menéndez, A. J., Pérez, R., & Moreno, B. (2014). Environmental costs and renewable energy: Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 368-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.017

Lorente, D. B., & Álvarez-Herranz, A. (2016). Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(16), 16478-16494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6773-3

Moshiri, S., & Daneshmand, A. (2020). How effective is government spending on environmental protection in a developing country? An empirical evidence from Iran. Journal of Economic Studies, 47(4), 789-803. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-12-2018-0458

Musolesi, A., Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2010). A panel data heterogeneous Bayesian estimation of environmental Kuznets curves for CO2 emissions. Applied Economics, 42(18), 2275-2287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701858034

Neve, M., & Hamaide, B. (2017). Environmental Kuznets Curve with Adjusted Net Savings as a Trade-Off Between Environment and Development. Australian Economic Papers, 56(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12078

Nguyen, V. B. (2024). Does governance contribute to the public spending – CO2 emissions nexus in developing economies? Policy lessons for sustainable development. Public Sector Economics, 48(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.48.1.4

Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236

Pata, U. K., & Caglar, A. E. (2021). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy, 216, 119220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220

Pata, U. K., Erdogan, S., & Ozcan, B. (2023a). Evaluating the role of the share and intensity of renewable energy for sustainable development in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138482

Pata, U. K., Erdogan, S., & Ozkan, O. (2023b). Is reducing fossil fuel intensity important for environmental management and ensuring ecological efficiency in China? Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117080

Pata, U. K., & Karlilar Pata, S. (2024a). Towards sustainable development in African countries: Are modern and combustible renewable energies effective? Sustainable Development, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3040

Pata, U. K., & Karlilar, S. (2024b). The integrated influence of energy security risk and green innovation on the material footprint: An EKC analysis based on fossil material flows. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, 140469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140469

Petrović, P., & Lobanov, M. M. (2020). The impact of R&D expenditures on CO2 emissions: Evidence from sixteen OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119187

Pirgaip, B., Bayrakdar, S., & Kaya, M. V. (2023). The role of government spending within the environmental Kuznets curve framework: evidence from G7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(34), 81513-81530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25180-9

Postula, M., & Radecka-Moroz, K. (2020). Fiscal policy instruments in environmental protection. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 84, 106435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106435

Rehman, M. U., & Rashid, M. (2017). Energy consumption to environmental degradation, the growth appetite in SAARC nations. Renewable Energy, 111, 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.100

Sadik-Zada, E. R., & Loewenstein, W. (2020). Drivers of CO 2 -Emissions in Fossil Fuel Abundant. Energies, 13.

Safi, A., Chen, Y., & Zheng, L. (2022). The Impact of Energy Productivity and Eco-Innovation on Sustainable Environment in Emerging Seven (E-7) Countries: Does Institutional Quality Matter? Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.878243

Salman, M., Long, X., Dauda, L., & Mensah, C. N. (2019). The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from Indonesia, South Korea and Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118331

Sapkota, P., & Bastola, U. (2017). Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: Panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Economics, 64, 206-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.001

Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhya, S. (1992). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time-Series and Cross-Country Evidence. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/833431468739515725/Economic-growth-and-environmental-quality-time-series-and-cross-country-evidence

Shahbaz, M., & Sinha, A. (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 106-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-09-2017-0249

Shao, L., Zhang, H., & Irfan, M. (2022). How public expenditure in recreational and cultural industry and socioeconomic status caused environmental sustainability in OECD countries? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 4625-4642. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2015614

Sinha, A., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: Role of renewable energy generation in India. Renewable Energy, 119, 703-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.058

Sinha, A., Shahbaz, M., & Balsalobre, D. (2017). Exploring the relationship between energy usage segregation and environmental degradation in N-11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1217-1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.071

Stef, N., Başağaoğlu, H., Chakraborty, D., & Ben Jabeur, S. (2023). Does institutional quality affect CO2 emissions? Evidence from explainable artificial intelligence models. Energy Economics, 124, 106822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106822

Tenaw, D., & Beyene, A. D. (2021). Environmental sustainability and economic development in sub-Saharan Africa: A modified EKC hypothesis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110897

Uzar, U. (2021). The relationship between institutional quality and ecological footprint: Is there a connection? Natural Resources Forum, 45(4), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12235

Wang, Q., Li, Y., & Li, R. (2024). Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: the impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02736-9

Wawrzyniak, D., & Doryń, W. (2020). Does the quality of institutions modify the economic growth-carbon dioxide emissions nexus? Evidence from a group of emerging and developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 33(1), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1708770

World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=World%20Development%20Indicators

Xaisongkham, S., & Liu, X. (2024). Institutional quality, employment, FDI and environmental degradation in developing countries: evidence from the balanced panel GMM estimator. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(7), 1920-1939. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2021-1583

Yaduma, N., Kortelainen, M., & Wossink, A. (2015). The environmental Kuznets curve at different levels of economic development: a counterfactual quantile regression analysis for CO2 emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(3), 278-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2015.1004118

Yang, Y., Niu, G., Tang, D., & Zhu, M. (2018). Spatial econometric analysis of the effect of government governance on regional emission reduction: Evidence from China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(6), 2833-2842. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/80727

Yilanci, V., & Pata, U. K. (2022). On the interaction between fiscal policy and CO2 emissions in G7 countries: 1875–2016. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2021.1950575

Zheng, L., Umar, M., Safi, A., & Khaddage-Soboh, N. (2024). The role of higher education and institutional quality for carbon neutrality: Evidence from emerging economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 406-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.008

Zoundi, Z. (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1067-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.018

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Economics and Environment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.