Abstract
The aim of this article is to present the main barriers identified by people with disabilities when using urban public transport in the context of implementing sustainable development solutions. The main reason for undertaking the research was to answer the question of whether people with disabilities use sustainable means of transport and to identify barriers that hinder more sustainable behaviour. To this end, a CAWI survey was conducted among public transport passengers in Poland. The following hypotheses were adopted in the study: H 1: People with disabilities are statistically significantly more likely to rate public transport in a city or region as unsuitable for their needs than people without disabilities. H 2: Different forms of public transport create different barriers that limit the accessibility and comfort of persons with disabilities to varying degrees, and the type of barriers depends on the specific characteristics of the means of transport. In all forms of urban public transport surveyed (buses, streetcar and rail), persons with disabilities encounter at least three types of barriers, the occurrence and severity of which depend on the type of transport. The elimination of perceived barriers is a prerequisite for changing the transport behaviour and activity of persons with disabilities. Research has shown that there are barriers in public transport that are perceived by persons with disabilities, their carers and able-bodied persons alike. However, it is people with disabilities who experience these barriers to a greater extent. The barriers include the availability of adapted infrastructure (rolling stock and stations/stops) and the service and knowledge of the needs of this group of people by staff (employees). The results of the research are particularly important for transport operators and public transport organisers. The study makes an important contribution to discussions on sustainable transport by not only pinpointing the obstacles that people with disabilities face in using local public transport, but also by comparing these barriers across different modes of transport within the framework of sustainable urban mobility. Its innovative nature lies in demonstrating that, regardless of the specific means of transport, the same categories of barriers are identified – infrastructural, informational and those resulting from the attitudes and competences of staff.
References
Akinyemi, E., & Zuidgeest, M. (2000). Sustainable development and transportation: Past experiences and future challenges. World Transport Policy & Practice, 6(1), 31–39.
Budziewicz-Guzlecka, A., & Drab-Kurowska, A. (2018). Selected aspects of corporate social responsibility in maritime freight services on the example of selected courier companies. SHS Web of Conferences, 58, 01003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185801003
Convention. (2006). Konwencja o prawach osób niepełnosprawnych, sporządzona w Nowym Jorku dnia 13 grudnia 2006 r., Dz.U. 2012, poz. 1169. (in Polish).
Deakin, E. (2001). Sustainable development and sustainable transportation: Strategies for economic prosperity, environmental quality, and equity (Working Paper 2001-3). University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0m1047xc
Dehghanmongabadi, A., & Hoşkara, Ş. (2020). Determinative variables toward promoting use of active modes of transportation: Enhancing level of sustainable mobility in communities. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020961118
Drozdz, W., & Pomianowski, A. (2020). Elektromobilność w transporcie wodnym jako alternatywa dla transportu miejskiego i drogowego w największych polskich miastach. In Energia współczesnych miast. Warszawa: PWN. (in Polish).
Drozdz, W., Rosa, G., & Pomianowski, A. (2022). The importance of introducing zero- and low-carbon solutions in urban bus transport. Energies, 15(13), 4914. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134914
Egelston, A. E. (2013). Sustainable development: A history. Springer Science and Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4878-1
European Commission. (1992a). Green paper on the impact of transport on the environment: A community strategy for sustainable mobility (COM(92) 46 final).
European Commission. (1992b). White paper on the future development of the common transport policy: A global approach to the construction of a community framework for sustainable mobility (COM(92) 494 final).
European Commission. (1995a). Green paper: The citizen’s network – Fulfilling the potential of public passenger transport in Europe (COM(95) 601 final).
European Commission. (1995b). Green paper: Towards fair and efficient pricing in transport (COM(95) 691 final).
European Commission. (2001). White paper: European transport policy for 2010 – Time to decide (COM(2001) 370 final).
European Commission. (2007). Green paper: Towards a new culture of urban mobility (COM(2007) 551 final).
European Commission. (2009). Action plan on urban mobility (COM(2009) 490 final).
European Commission. (2010). Communication from the Commission: Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
European Commission. (2011a). Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system (COM(2011) 144 final).
European Commission. (2011b). White paper: Roadmap to a single European transport area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system (COM(2011) 144 final).
European Commission. (2016). A European strategy for low-emission mobility (COM(2016) 501 final).
European Commission. (2017a). Communication from the Commission: Europe on the move – An action programme for a socially just transition to clean, competitive and connected mobility for all (COM(2017) 283 final).
European Commission. (2017b). White paper on the future of Europe: Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025 (COM(2017) 2025). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2017:2025:FIN
European Commission. (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank: A clean planet for all – A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy (COM(2018) 773 final).
European Commission. (2018). Long-term strategy to 2050. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2050_pl
European Commission. (2019a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Green Deal (COM(2019) 640 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640
European Commission. (2019b). Reflection paper: Towards a sustainable Europe by 2030 (COM(2019) 22).
European Commission. (2021). Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 'Fit For 55': delivering the EU's 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality (COM(2021) 550 final).
European Parliament. (2018). Research for TRAN Committee: Transport and tourism for persons with disabilities and persons with reduced mobility. Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/617465/IPOL_STU(2018)617465_EN.pdf
Eurostat. (2021). Disability statistics introduced. Category:Disability - Statistics Explained - Eurostat
Gudmundsson, H., & Höjer, M. (1996). Sustainable development principles and their implications for transport. Ecological Economics, 19(3), 269–282.
GUS. (2015). Badanie pilotażowe zachowań komunikacyjnych ludności w Polsce: Etap III – raport końcowy. Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Centrum Badań i Edukacji Statystycznej. https://stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultstronaopisowa/5851/1/1/raport_koncowy_badanie_pilotazowe_zachowan_komunikacyjnych.pdf (in Polish).
Hydryńska, B. (2021). Droga do zrównoważonego rozwoju w Polsce w świetle założeń Agendy 2030. Warszawa: Difin. (in Polish).
Kahle, L., & Gurel-Atay, E. (2014). Communicating sustainability for the green economy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315705491
Karjalainen, L. E., & Juhola, S. (2021). Urban transportation sustainability assessments: A systematic review of literature. Transport Reviews, 41(5), 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1879309
Kos, B., Krawczyk, G., Mercik, A., & Tomanek, R. (2022). Mobilność miast przyszłości. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach. (in Polish).
Lewicki, W., & Drozdz, W. (2021). Electromobility and its Development Prospects in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Comparative Study of Poland and the European Union. European Research Studies Journal, 24, 135–144. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i2-part2p135-144.html
Lubarska, A. (2018). Przegląd klasyfikacji barier i ograniczeń dla turystyki osób z niepełnosprawnością. In Z. Młynarczyk & A. Zajadacz (Eds.), Uwarunkowania i plany rozwoju turystyki (Vol. 20). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Bogucki. (in Polish).
Makarova, I., Shubenkova, K., Mavrin, V., Boyko, A., & Katunin, A. (2017). Development of sustainable transport in smart cities. In 2017 International Conference on Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/RTSI.2017.8065922
May, A. D. (2013). Urban transport and sustainability: The key challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(3), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2013.710136
McKercher, B., & Darcy, S. (2018). Re-conceptualizing barriers to travel by people with disabilities. Tourism Management Perspectives, 26, 59–66.
Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1653531. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
Mezyk, A., & Zamkowska, S. (2019). Problemy transportowe miast: Stan i kierunki rozwiązań. Warszawa. (in Polish).
Ministry of Development and Technology. (2025, March 15). Zrównoważony rozwój. https://www.gov.pl/web/rozwoj-technologia/zrownowazony-rozwoj (in Polish).
Nijkamp, P. (1994). Roads toward environmentally sustainable transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 28(4), 261–271.
OECD. (2001). OECD Green Growth Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264111318-en
Parris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28(1), 559–586.
Railway Transport Office. (2017a). Wykorzystanie i potencjał kolejowych przewozów pasażerskich w Polsce. Wykorzystanie i potencjał kolejowych przewozów pasażerskich w Polsce 2017 - Analizy i opracowania Urząd Transportu Kolejowego. (in Polish).
Railway Transport Office. (2017b). Koleje pasażerskie w województwach - dynamika zmian. Koleje pasażerskie w województwach - dynamika zmian 2017 - Analizy i opracowania Urząd Transportu Kolejowego. (in Polish).
Railway Transport Office. (2021a). Wpływ pandemii COVID-19 na rynek kolejowy w 2020 r. Wpływ pandemii COVID-19 na rynek kolejowy w 2020 r. - Opracowania Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego Urząd Transportu Kolejowego. (in Polish).
Railway Transport Office. (2021b). Badanie satysfakcji pasażerów kolei 2021. https://utk.gov.pl/pl/dokumenty-i-formularze/opracowania-urzedu-tran/19585,Badanie-satysfakcji-pasazerow-kolei-2021.html (in Polish).
Railway Transport Office. (2021c). Portal statystyczny UTK. https://dane.utk.gov.pl/sts/ (in Polish).
Raitasuo, P., Bask, A., & Rajahonka, M. (2019). Sustainable intermodal train transport. In L. de Boer & P. Houman Andersen (Eds.), Operations management and sustainability (pp. 233–256). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93212-5_11
Resolution of the Polish Parliament. (1997). Uchwała o Karcie Praw Osób Niepełnosprawnych, M.P. 1997, nr 50, poz. 475. (in Polish).
Rosa, G. (2020). Analysis of preferences of rail passengers in the context of sustainable development. In K. S. Soliman (Ed.), Sustainable economic development and advancing education excellence in the era of global pandemic. Proceedings of the 36th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), 4–5 November 2020, Granada, Spain. International Business Information Management Association.
Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.
Sdoukopoulos, A., Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M., Basbas, S., & Papaioannou, P. (2019). Measuring progress towards transport sustainability through indicators: Analysis and metrics of the main indicator initiatives. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 67, 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.020
Tennøy, A., Hansson, L., Lissandrello, E., & Næss, P. (2016). How planners’ use and non-use of expert knowledge affect the goal achievement potential of plans: Experiences from strategic land-use and transport planning processes in three Scandinavian cities. Progress in Planning, 109, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2015.05.002
United Nations. (2015). Zrównoważony rozwój i cele zrównoważonego rozwoju. https://www.unic.un.org.pl/strony-2011-2015/zrownowazony-rozwoj-i-cele-zrownowazonego-rozwoju/2860 (in Polish).
UNWTO. (2016). Manual on accessible tourism for all: Principles, tools and best practices – Module I: Accessible tourism – Definition and context. Madrid.
Ustawa z dnia 19 lipca 2019 r. o zapewnieniu dostępności osobom ze szczególnymi potrzebami, Dz.U. 2019, poz. 1696, ze zm.
Wang, L., Xue, X., Zhao, Z., & Wang, Z. (2018). The impacts of transportation infrastructure on sustainable development: Emerging trends and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1172.
Werner, A. (2023). Turystyka osób z niepełnosprawnościami w świetle badań własnych. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. (in Polish).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Economics and Environment
