Keywords
ESG environmental practices
local communities
institutional context
Poland and Germany
How to Cite
Abstract
The aim of this article is to examine how family firms in Poland and Germany engage in ESG environmental practices and how the institutional and cultural context shapes these behaviours. The study uses a mixed-method design consisting of a questionnaire survey of 73 family firms and 18 semi-structured interviews with owners and managers, thereby combining breadth of comparison with in-depth qualitative insight into the motivations behind environmental engagement. Environmental initiatives include, among others, improving energy efficiency, waste and resource management, and reducing emissions, which affect operating costs, access to financing, and exposure to regulatory risk. The results of the study show that Polish family firms tend to base their environmental practices on community and value-based logic, while German companies embed them more strongly in formal ESG strategies and regulatory compliance. These differences translate into different patterns of local environmental initiatives and perceived economic benefits from such activities. The main limitation is the relatively small German sub-sample, which limits the possibility of statistical generalisations. The article contains practical implications for adapting environmental policy instruments to the needs of family firms and adds value by combining the perspectives of ESG, environmental economics and family business.
References
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the “S” back in corporate social responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organisations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
Amore, M. D., & Bennedsen, M. (2016). Corporate governance and green innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 75, 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.003
Aragón Correa, J. A., Hurtado Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022
Azzone, G., Bianchi, R., Mauri, R., & Noci, G. (1997). Defining operating environmental strategies: Programmes and plans within Italian industries. Environmental Management and Health, 8(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09566169710159159
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Basco, R., & Bartkevičiūtė, I. (2016). Is there any room for family business into European Union 2020 Strategy? Family business and regional public policy. Local Economy, 31(6), 709–732.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094216664485
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
Berrone, P., Duran, P., Peréz-Batres, L. A., & Van Essen, M. (2022). Family firms and environmental performance: A meta-analytic review. Family Business Review, 35(2), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211064409
Block, J., & Wagner, M. (2014). The impact of family ownership on various dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from large American firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(7), 475–492.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. (2014). Towards a practical approach to strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 35(8), 1249–1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2238
Clarkson, P., Overell, M., & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus, 47(1), 27–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00330.x
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.701
De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Campopiano, G., & Cassia, L. (2015). The impact of family involvement on the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: theory and evidence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 924–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12093
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). Back to the iron cage: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dyer, W. G., Jr., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00151.x
Gadenne, D., Kennedy, J., & McKeiver, C. (2009). An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9672-9.
Gómez Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Gómez Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.593320
Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.
Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112
Kaplan, S. (2014). Combining quantitative and qualitative research. In D. J. Teece & M. Augier (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management (pp. 1–5). Palgrave Macmillan.
Korzeb, Z., Niedziółka, P., Szpilko, D., & de la Torre Gallegos, A. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of ESG performance in the cooperative banks: From the regulatory framework to institutional diversity. Economics and Environment, 79(1), 45–62.
Le Breton Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2016). Family firms and practices of sustainability: A contingency view. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.09.001
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00718.x
Miroshnychenko, I., De Massis, A., Barontini, R., & Testa, F. (2022). Family firms and environmental performance: A meta-analytic review. Family Business Review, 35(2), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211064409
Niedziółka, P., Bernardelli, M., & Korzeb, Z. (2024). Factors of ESG ratings assigned to commercial banks: The cultural and credit risk dimensions. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(51), 33-63. https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2023.2.02
Pan, X., Qiu, S., & Sinha, P. (2024). ESG performance and the value of family firms: International evidence. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 586. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03074-6
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
Saeed, A., Zameer, H., & Kausar, N. (2024). Environmental sustainability of family firms: A meta-analysis of factors and outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 48(5), 1123–1154. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587231221799
Small, M. L. (2011). How to conduct mixed-methods research: recent trends in a rapidly expanding literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102657
Zhu, Y. (2025). Environmental, Social, and Governance in Family Firms: A Bibliometric Review and Agenda for Future Research. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 35(2), 593-613.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Economics and Environment