Keywords
national park
tourism development
nature protection
forest
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of this paper was to present the results of research on the willingness of visitors to Wielkopolska National Park (WNP) to pay fees for using its resources and to assess their attitudes towards hypothetical restrictions on access to the park. The analysis was based on survey data from 2012 and 2025, obtained using the following techniques: Paper and Pencil Interviewing (PAPI) and online surveys based on the Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI) technique, administered via Internet platforms. A total of 860 valid questionnaires were examined, and a logit model and correspondence analysis were used for the investigation. The findings suggest that the propensity to pay fees is mostly contingent upon the extent of awareness of natural values, the inclination to engage in park maintenance, perspectives on environmental financing mechanisms, and affiliation with environmental organisations. In turn, demographic factors proved to be insignificant. The analysis of the expected compensation for access restrictions demonstrated the influence of age, gender, environmental views, and distance from the WNP. The research findings corroborate that respondents’ attitudes towards environmental financing are predominantly influenced by their environmental awareness and beliefs.
References
Agnoletti, M., & Santoro, A. (2015). Cultural values and sustainable forest management. Journal of Forest Research, 20, 438-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-015-0500-7
An, R., Wang, F., Sakurai, J., & Kitagawa, H. (2024). Willing or Not? Rural Residents’ Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Conservation in Economically Underdeveloped Regions: A Case Study in China’s Qinling National Park. Sustainability, 16(6), 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062440
Bartczak, A. (2015). The role of social and environmental attitudes in non-market valuation: An application to the Białowieża Forest. Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.011
Bateman, I. J., & Willis, K. G. (Eds.). (2001). Valuing environmental preferences: Theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries. Oxford University Press.
Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., & Loomes, G. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009727
Bennett, N. J., & Roth, R. (2018). Realizing the transformative potential of conservation through the social sciences. Biological Conservation, 229, A6-A8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.023
Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A., Harring, N., & Jagers, S. C. (2022). Meta-analyses of fifteen determinants of public opinion about climate taxes and laws. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01297-6
Brown, T. C., & Gregory, R. (1999). Why the WTA–WTP disparity matters. Ecological Economics, 28(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00050-0
Carson, R. T. & Hanemann W.M (2005). Contingent valuation. In K.-G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics (2, pp. 821–936). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0099(05)02017-6
Carson, R. T., Flores, N. E., & Meade, N. F. (2001). Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19(2), 173–210. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011128332243
Czajkowski, M., Buszko-Briggs, M., & Hanley, N. (2009). Valuing Changes in Forest Biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 68(12), 2910–2917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.016
Drupp, M. A., Turk, Z. M., Groom, B., & Heckenhahn, J. (2024). Global evidence on the income elasticity of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. Environmental and Resource Economics, 88, 3765-3804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-025-01042-5
Ekoportal. (2025). Polskie parki narodowe. https://www.ekoportal.gov.pl/dane-o-srodowisku/polskie-parki-narodowe
Florek, J., Czerwińska-Kayzer, D., Melka, A., & Świercz, J. (2025) Polski Ład a obciążenia publicznoprawne mikroprzedsiębiorców - wyniki badań ankietowych. Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists. 27(2). 66-82. https://doi.org/ 10.5604/01.3001.0055.1078 (in Polish).
Giergiczny, M. (2009). Rekreacyjna wartość Białowieskiego Parku Narodowego – metoda kosztu podróży. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 2(36), 116–128. https://bazekon.uek.krakow.pl/zawartosc/171334333
Giergiczny, M., Czajkowski, M., Żylicz, T., & Angelstam, P. (2015). Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes. Ecological Economics 119, 8-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.032
Gołos, P. T. (2018). Społeczne i ekonomiczne aspekty pozaprodukcyjnych funkcji lasu i gospodarki leśnej – wyniki badań opinii społecznej. Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa. (in Polish).
Hadker, N., Sharma, S., David, A., & Muraleedharan, T. R. (1997). Willingness-to-pay for Borivli National Park: Evidence from a contingent valuation. Ecological Economics, 21(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00094-8
Hanemann, W. M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? American Economic Review, 81(3), 635–647. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2006525
Hanley, N., & Czajkowski, M. (2019). The Role of Stated Preference Valuation Methods in Understanding Choices and Informing Policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(2), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez005
Hanus, G. (2024). Sustainable Behaviors of Young Polish Consumers: the Impact on Logistics and Business Strategies. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 13(4), 399. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2024.v13n4p399
Horowitz, J. K., & McConnell, K. E. (2002). A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(3), 426–447. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1215
Ivlevs, A. (2018). Adverse welfare shocks and pro-environmental behavior: Evidence from the global economic crisis. Review of Income and Wealth, 65(2), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12355
Jacobsen, J. B., & Hanley, N. (2009). Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation? Environmental and Resource Economics, 43(2), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8
Jurowski, C., Uysal, M., & Williams, D. R. (1997). A theoretical analysis of host community resident reactions to tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 36(2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759703600202
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325–1348. https://doi.org/10.1086/261737
Kaliszewski, A., Wysocka-Fijorek, E., Ciesielski, M., Stereńczak, K., & Gołos, P. (2024). From forest functions to forest ecosystem services – The evolution of the attitude towards forest benefits in Poland. Sylwan, 168(4), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2024005
Kondracki, J. (2013). Geografia regionalna Polski. PWN. (in Polish).
Knetsch, J. L., & Sinden, J. A. (1984). Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(3), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885962
Kaczmarczyk, S. (2013). Badania marketingowe. Metody i techniki, Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne. (in Polish).
Krok, E. (2015). Budowa kwestionariusza ankietowego a wyniki badań. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego – Studia Informatica, 37, 55-73. https://doi.org/10.18276/si.2015.37-05 (in Polish).
Krzewińska, A., & Grzeszkiewicz-Radulska, E. (2013). Klasyfikacja sondażowych technik otrzymywania materiałów. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 62(1), 9-31. https://journals.ltn.lodz.pl/Przeglad-Socjologiczny/issue/view/86/92 (in Polish).
Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(8), 2207–2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126
Lo, A. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2010). Willingness of residents to pay and motives for conservation of urban green spaces in the compact city of Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.10.001
López-Mosquera, N., & Sánchez, M. (2012). Theory of Planned Behavior and Value-Belief-Norm Theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.029
Loureiro, M. L., & Lotade, J. (2005). Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? Ecological Economics, 53(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.002
Mandziuk, A., Fornal-Pieniak, B., & Ollik, M. (2021). The willingness of inhabitants in a medium-sized city and the city’s surroundings settlements to pay for recreation in urban forests in Poland. iForest, 14(5), 483-489. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3758-014
Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska. (2025). Lasy społeczne – nowy rozdział w ochronie przyrody i jakości życia mieszkańców miast. https://www.gov.pl/web/klimat/lasy-spoleczne-nowy-rozdzial-w-ochronie-przyrody-i-jakosci-zycia-mieszkancow-miast (in Polish).
Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Natural Resources Journal, 29(3), 900-902. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24883508
Morrison, G. C. (1997). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: some evidence of an endowment effect. Applied Economics, 29(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368497326903
Nordlund, A., & Westin, K. (2010). Forest values and forest management attitudes among private forest owners in Sweden. Forests, 2(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/f2010030
Nolander, C., & Lundmark, R. (2024). A review of forest ecosystem services and their spatial value characteristics. Forests, 15(6), 919. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15060919
Nowak, S. (2011). Metodologia badań społecznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. (in Polish).
Piepiora, Z., & Godlewska, M. E. (2016). Rekreacyjna wartość Tatrzańskiego Parku Narodowego. Europa Regionum, 28, 267-278. https://wnus.edu.pl/er/file/article/view/6013/22735.pdf (in Polish).
Pukkala, T. (2021). Measuring the social performance of forest management. Journal of Forestry Research, 32, 1803–1818. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11676-021-01321-z
Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, E., Matel, A., Poskrobko, T., & Andrejuk, D. (2022). How viewing a forest affects willingness to pay of users and non-users in contingent valuation method. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 81(2), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.81.2.447
Sutton, P. C., Duncan, S. L. & Sharolyn, J. A. (2019). Valuing our national parks: An ecological economics perspective. Land, 8(4), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8040054
Szoszkiewicz, K., Zydroń, A., & Górna, M. (2015). Znaczenie Wielkopolskiego Parku Narodowego dla mieszkańców aglomeracji poznańskiej. Sylwan, 159(3), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2014034 (in Polish).
Tyllianakis, E., & Skuras, D. (2016). The income elasticity of willingness to pay revisited: Meta-analysis for water resources under the Water Framework Directive. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.012
Waring, T., & Longo, A. (2025). Implementing carbon capture and storage in the United Kingdom: Public preferences and willingness to pay. Environmental Management, 75(6), 1432-1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02174-6
WPN. (2025). Wielkopolski Park Narodowy. https://wpn.gov.pl/ (in Polish).
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 913-934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
Zydroń, A., Szoszkiewicz, K., & Chwiałkowski, C. (2021). Valuing protected areas: Socioeconomic determinants of the willingness to pay for the national park. Sustainability, 13 (2), 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020765
Zydroń, A., Kayzer, D., & Szoszkiewicz, K. (2015). Factors differentiating expected compensation level for limiting usage of the National Park of Wielkopolska. Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses, 12(4), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.56583/br.994
Zydroń, A., & Kayzer, D. (2015). Podnoszenie świadomości społeczeństwa o nowych metodach wyceny wartości przyrody (WTP i WTA) na przykładzie Wielkopolskiego Parku Narodowego. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe. (in Polish).
Zydroń, A., Kayzer, D., Szoszkiewicz, K., & Iwiński, M. (2017). Contingent valuation of the Wielkopolska National Park by respondents of differentiated age and education. Economics and Environment, 60(1), 10. https://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/journal/article/view/244
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Economics and Environment